• Support
  • Log In
  • Sign Up
ANZIIF Logo
Go back
Professional Development

Need help with professional development?

Contact Support

View by Kind
Go back
View by Kind
Short Courses Qualifications Skills Units Compliance Webinars Events Articles Videos Activities Whitepapers Ask an Expert
View by Sector
Go back
View by Sector
Claims General Insurance Insurance Broking Reinsurance Risk Management Life and Retirement Income
All Professional Development The Journal Recognition of Prior Learning Your Career in Insurance
Studying with ANZIIF
Go back
Studying with ANZIIF Enrol Academic Calendar Assessments FNS20 Training Package Student Support
For Companies
Go back
For Companies Train your staff Life Insurance Professional Standards General Insurance Claims Handling Framework Reference books Government Training Incentives
Go back
Membership

Need help with your membership?

Contact Support

Member Tools
Go back
Member Tools
Login Become a member Renew or Reinstate your membership
Members Centre - Professional Development
About membership
Go back
About membership
Your Membership Guide Member Levels Benefits Certified Insurance Professionals Digital Badge Member Directory Pro Rata 2025
Scholarships and Awards
Go back
Scholarships and Awards
Australian Industry Awards New Zealand Industry Awards Academic Awards Lloyds Scholarship Turks Bright Light Award ICNZ and ANZIIF Scholarship
Go back
About ANZIIF

ANZIIF is the leading membership, training and professional development organisation for the insurance and finance industry in the Asia-Pacific region. We partner with a broad range of organisations and government to provide services that support professional excellence. We help enhance standards and improve community understanding of insurance and finance.

Overview
Go back
Overview History Boards and Councils Annual Reports Media Governance Corporate Sponsorship Partners Careers at ANZIIF Contact
Community Initiatives
Go back
Community Initiatives
Your Career in Insurance Careers in Insurance Corporate Supporter Making a Difference Awards Donna Walker Awards Life Insurance Professional Standards General Insurance Claims Handling Framework Generation i
ANZIIF Logo
Professional Development Articles
Article
0.25CIP Points

Supreme Court weighs medical panel's approach to unrelated impairments

Jonathan Maher and Ben Kelly, Wotton Kearney
20 Jan 2025 - Reading time 2 minutes
General Insurance Claims
Supreme Court weighs Medical Panel's approach to unrelated impairments

At a glance

  • The claimant issued a judicial review application to challenge the medical panel’s decision that his knee impairment stemmed from pre-existing conditions, not a fall.
  • The Victorian Supreme Court upheld the panel’s decision, rejecting the claimant’s argument that section 28LL(3) of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) contains two "tests".
  • The case reinforces the importance of expertise in the often-complex law around medical panel determinations.

Wotton Kearney acted for the operator of a Victorian shopping centre in successfully defending an application for judicial review of a medical panel determination.

Background

The claimant alleged that he sustained a left knee injury after tripping at a shopping centre in Melbourne in 2021.

He served the operator of the centre with a Certificate of Assessment pursuant to the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) (the Act) that stated that his injuries met the threshold to entitle him to claim general damages in his action.

However, Wotton Kearney recommended that the operator refer the claimant to the medical panel, and in August 2023 the panel handed down a determination finding that the claimant’s injuries did not meet the threshold.

Critically, the claimant had a significant history of issues with that knee, including having undergone a knee replacement, and in fact had been in hospital only a few months prior to his trip as a result of an infection in his prosthesis.

The panel determined that, although the claimant was suffering from persistent left knee dysfunction, this was a consequence of his pre-existing issues, not the incident. Pursuant to section 28LL(3) of the Act, the panel was obliged to disregard any impairment it believed was caused by the claimant’s previous issues.

The claimant otherwise had no impairment from the incident alone that met the relevant threshold.

Application for judicial review

The claimant issued an application for judicial review of the panel’s decision in the Victorian Supreme Court.

In summary, his primary argument was that:

  • Section 28LL(3) does confirm that when the panel is assessing the degree of impairment arising from an incident “… impairments from unrelated injuries or causes are to be disregarded".
  • However, it also requires the panel to assess not just injuries that were caused by the incident, but also injuries related to the incident, a broader test
  • In this case, the claimant suffered direct soft tissue injuries to his left knee when he tripped, but also various "consequential injuries" that were "related" to the incident, such as swelling, infection, bone growth and so forth
  • In essence, section 28LL(3) contains two tests and “each must be looked at”, however in this case the panel “only applied half the test” and therefore fell into jurisdictional error.

On behalf of the shopping centre operator and the medical panel itself, WK argued that the claimant’s case was misconceived and that the panel had correctly applied both the legislation and the case law.

Supreme Court decision

On 26 September 2024 His Honour O’Meara J dismissed the claimant’s application.

He found that there was no compelling evidence (or authority) to suggest that section 28LL(3) should be taken to state two “tests”, noting that “to say that an impairment is "resulting from"’ a claimed injury is to do no more than state a straightforward relationship of cause (claimed injury) and effect (degree of whole person impairment)”.

His Honour found that the panel had directed itself to the appropriate analysis and applied reasoning (and reached a conclusion) that did not misconstrue or fail to comply with any relevant provision in the Act.

Implications

Although the facts and issues in this case were unique, the decision provides useful confirmation of the approach to be taken by the medical panel when assessing a claimant’s degree of whole person impairment.

It also provides a reminder for defendants and insurers to continue to carefully analyse the often-complex rules and procedures to be applied by the panel in order to identify potential errors or, alternatively, to be able to defend challenges to the Panel’s decisions, as in this case.

This article first appeared on the Wotton Kearney website and is republished with permission.

This is Worth

0.25 CIP Points

Login to Collect Points & Comment
What are CIP Points? About ANZIIF Membership
Professional Development

Related Resources

  • Premium

    Article
    0.25 CIP Points

    CASE STUDY — How the negligent reading of an exception led to wrongful advice

    In this real-life case study, a well-qualified and experienced loss adjuster failed to correctly int
    14 Jan 2025
    12 min read
  • Premium

    Article
    0.25 CIP Points

    Working towards prevention rather than claims in the fight against cancer

    Cancer accounts for a high percentage of insurance claims. By motivating policyholders to adopt heal
    19 Nov 2024
    3 min read
  • Article
    0.25 CIP Points

    Case study — A flood and a dishonest insured

    In the wake of the severe flooding event in Auckland on 27 January 2023, an insured made a fraudulen
    28 Oct 2024
    4 min read
  • Article
    0.25 CIP Points

    What do insurers need to know about class actions?

    A spate of filings in 2020 and 2021 saw issues such as climate change and forever chemicals hit the
    26 Sep 2024
    4 min read
  • Your comment has been successfully posted

    Comments

    Loading comments

    Remove Comment

    Are you sure you want to delete your comment?
    This cannot be undone.

    kitchen sink logo
    • About
    • Professional Development
    • Membership
    • Compliance
    • Contact Us
    • Enrol
    • Become a Member
    • Login
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms & Conditions

    © Copyright The Australian and New Zealand Institute of Insurance and Finance Inc. 2021

    RTO NO. 3596